Resolving a contested delay on a treatment plant expansion
Forensic schedule analysis and claims support that moved a stalled dispute to an evidence-based settlement.
Two parties, two narratives, one plant still to finish.
A wastewater treatment plant expansion finished well beyond its contract completion date. The contractor attributed the delay to the owner; the utility pointed to contractor performance. Each side had schedules that appeared to support its position.
With public funds at stake and the parties still working together on site, both needed an analysis they could understand and test.
Representative engagement. Client identity withheld; specifics anonymized and illustrative.
How we turned it around
We let the contemporaneous record speak, window by window, with every step open to inspection.
The difference we made
The parties moved from entrenched positions to a settlement grounded in the record.
A transparent method with every assumption stated.
Delay allocated on evidence rather than assertion.
Settlement reached without the cost of formal proceedings.
The analysis was so clear that the argument simply ran out of room.Representative client perspective
Command the date you announced.
Book a 45-minute program review with a senior principal. You will leave with an independent read of where your schedule and cost really stand, and the three moves that matter most.